Here they are: the finest films of the 21st Century so far, as voted for by 177 critics from around the world. Topped by a surreal Hollywood neo-noir that was intended as a pilot for a television series, the top 10 includes a Japanese cartoon about a girl who works in a bath house for monsters (Spirited Away: number four on the list), a plotless overview of a Texan boy’s adolescence (Boyhood: five), a chaste love story spanning several years in 1960s Hong Kong (In the Mood for Love: two), and a melancholy romantic comedy involving a memory-erasing machine (Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind: six).
View image of Boyhood
BBC Culture being an English-language site, there is an inevitable bias: even the most well-travelled festival hound is bound to see more releases in their own language than any other. But it is still a phenomenally diverse and international assortment, with a groundbreaking documentary about the Indonesian genocide (The Act of Killing: 14) sitting next to a Romanian abortion drama (4 Months, 3 Weeks & 2 Days: 15), and a fantasy about a fairy underworld in Francoist Spain (Pan’s Labyrinth: 17) sitting next to a genre-hopping French oddity, which features Kylie Minogue and some talking cars (Holy Motors: 16). Cartoons aside, there isn’t much in the list’s upper reaches that could be classed as mainstream entertainment.
The remarkable films on the list suggest that cinema is in far ruder health than we’re often led to believe
What conclusions can we draw? One might be that Steven Soderbergh and Yorgos Lanthimos aren’t the critical darlings you might have thought. Another could be that there really should be more films directed by women in the world. But the cornucopia of remarkable, innovative films on the list also suggests that cinema is in far ruder health than we’re often led to believe.
New world order
Glance at any page of news about the movie business, and you’ll spot a headline announcing that Hollywood is dumbing down, that product placement is on the rise, and that dialogue is being whittled away to grunts and one-liners so that films can be exported with the minimum of redubbing. There are reports of cinemas closing, of piracy depriving the industry of zillions of pounds, of television offering more sophisticated narratives than its slow-witted multiplex cousin.
But the 100 inventive films in our selection indicate that, despite all this, we may actually be living in a golden age of cinema. It’s notable that the tally doesn’t rely on the giants of the late 20th Century: Spielberg and Scorsese have just one film apiece; Mike Leigh, Ken Loach, Werner Herzog and the Dardenne brothers are absent; and the only Coppola represented isn’t Francis but his daughter Sofia. And yet the old guard is hardly missed. There is a wealth of astonishing films out there if you know where to find them - and knowing where to find them has never been easier.
View image of The White Ribbon
Critics have an unfair advantage when it comes to happening upon the best stuff, admittedly. If you’re lucky enough to be paid to write about film, or, better still, to report from festivals which serve up the cream of the crop, you may well have a rosier view of the state of cinema than someone who has to choose between Suicide Squad and The Legend of Tarzan on a Friday night.
But none of us is as far from a life-enhancing film as we used to be. In the 20th Century, anyone who was in the mood for a monochrome musing on the roots of Nazism (The White Ribbon: 18) would have had a tricky job. Even in the heyday of art-house cinemas and video stores, you had to wait a long time for a particular auteurist gem to wash up on your shores - and that’s assuming you had heard of it at all. But in the 21st Century, anyone with an internet connection should have no problem venturing beyond films that depict cities being flattened in 3D.
View image of FInding Nemo
We’re all just a click or two away from an intriguing trailer on YouTube, an appetite-whetting essay on a scholarly website, and an enthusiastic discussion in a message board. Another few clicks and we can order the film itself, either on DVD or download. It’s true that watching a taut Iranian domestic mystery (A Separation: 9) at home may not be the same as seeing it in a crowded cinema. But - for the film-maker as well as the viewer - it’s better than not watching it at all.
Let’s get digital
This brave new globalised world has its complications, of course. As studios grow ever more reliant on international sales and merchandising, they pour more and more of their resources into superhero and science-fiction blockbusters. The campaigning dramas, prestigious crime thrillers, and respectable literary adaptations which used to attract both audiences and awards in the 1980s and ‘90s are withering away.
The campaigning dramas, prestigious crime thrillers, and respectable literary adaptations are withering away
Directors often grumble about this trend. Rather than being able to tell grown-up human stories about contemporary life, they’re having to default either to megabudget sci-fi extravaganzas or to tiny indie films. But there is a bright side to this polarising effect, which is that the 21st Century has seen the death of so-called awards bait. The days are gone when Harvey Weinstein could snag the film rights to a bestselling novel, hire Lasse Hallström to direct a middlebrow, mid-budget, middle-of-the-road film version, and watch as the Oscar nominations rolled in.
View image of Mad Max
Instead, directors either have to give blockbusters their own idiosyncratic stamp – as George Miller did on Mad Max: Fury Road (15) and Christopher Nolan did on The Dark Knight (33) – or they have to put their energies into more experimental and personal projects. And while it may be a chore to get financing for these outré films, our list is inspirational proof that it is possible. Again, this has a lot to do with digital technology. Leos Carax shot Holy Motors on digital video, under protest, because he couldn’t secure the funding to use film, but the resulting oddball masterpiece is so fundamentally digital-ish in its look and feel that it’s hard to imagine it any other way.
Carax isn’t alone in being attached to film, rather than DV. Apichatpong Weerasethakul has said that Uncle Boonmee Who Can Recall His Past Lives (37) is, among other things, his lament for the demise of celluloid - and you can’t be in a room with more than three cinephiles without one of them waxing lyrical about the weight of a film canister and the purr of a projector. Digital tends to be scorned as a cheap and nasty substitute.
But even cineastes who grouse about DV on a regular basis are having to acknowledge that it is opening up all sorts of fascinating possibilities. Most obviously, there are the cartoons, such as Pixar’s WALL-E (29), Inside Out (41) and Finding Nemo (90), which wouldn’t exist without computer animation. (And without Pixar, computer animation wouldn’t exist in its current form, either.)
View image of Melancholia
Watching Terrence Malick’s The Tree of Life and Lars von Trier’s Melancholia are as close as some of us ever get to a religious experience
Then there are the films which take digital technology as their subject matter, such as Michael Haneke’s Caché (22) and David Fincher’s The Social Network (27). And there are others still which use this technology to make sublime art: watching the mesmeric prologues to Terrence Malick’s The Tree of Life (7) and Lars von Trier’s Melancholia (42) are as close as some of us ever get to a religious experience.
This is just the beginning. As digital cameras continue to get lighter and better, and streaming continues to get faster, it will become feasible for anyone not just to make their own film, but to send it around the planet. Already, it’s not unusual for a film to be shot in one country, edited in another, scored in a third. Soon, we will be able to talk about ‘world cinema’ in ways we never have done before. And it’s all because of developments that have taken place in the 21st Century. Here’s to the next 83 years.
More on BBC Culture’s 100 greatest films of the 21st Century:
The full list of the top 100 films
Surprising facts from the 100 greatest films of the 21st Century list
The list of critics who participated – and how they voted
What the critics had to say about the top 25
Why Mulholland Drive is number one
If you would like to comment on this story or anything else you have seen on BBC Culture, head over to our Facebook page or message us on Twitter.
And if you liked this story, sign up for the weekly bbc.com features newsletter, called “If You Only Read 6 Things This Week”. A handpicked selection of stories from BBC Future, Earth, Culture, Capital, Travel and Autos, delivered to your inbox every Friday.
What would I rather do, what a movie on DVD or at the cinema? I think I would rather watch a movie at the cinema because in the cinema they have a really good stereo so you can really enjoy the movie. Of course, watching a movie on DVD is good because you can relax at home but I would choose to spend the money and go to the cinema and have a really good time.
Martin, United States
My favorite way to watch a movie is at the cinema. I like the experience of being in a cinema, sitting in those nice comfy chairs, but especially the big screen. I think that's the most important thing as well as the sound in a cinema is a lot nicer than the one in my home, but seeing Laurence on Arabia or any other epic on a big screen is quite the experience and I'm willing to go take the time and see it at the cinema rather than at home.
Would I rather watch a movie at the cinema or at home on DVD? Well, I would definitely rather go to the cinema. There's a special magic at the cinema. You know, you're sitting there with your friends and you know, talking before the movie starts and then the lights go down and you've got your popcorn and your soft drinks and everything. That reminds me of, you know, having fun in childhood. If you're at home, you can, with a DVD, you can fast forward or whatever you like. Maybe it's more convenient, but it's just not so much fun.
DVD or the cinema? That's a good question. I mean I really like watching DVDs with my friends. I really like going to someone's house and it's a cheap way of watching a movie but I also really like going the cinema and I really like the atmosphere there. I prefer the atmosphere there to watching a DVD, and the other thing about the cinema is that I concentrate when I'm at the cinema. If I watch a DVD at home. I stop and go and I do some jobs. I can't focus, so I would say that I like the cinema.
Ah, no question, it's much better to watch a movie in the cinema, movie theater. I mean the screen is ten times as big, the sound system is huge and it's an outing. You know, watching a DVD at home is kind of like watching TV. No big deal.
Jeannie, United States
OK, so I prefer to watch movies in a cinema. I love the big screen and the surround sound is great and and I like to sit around a lot of people and get their reactions as well as my own. Unfortunately a lot of times, it's just cheaper to see it on a DVD for me because people often give me DVDs as gifts.