Why We Read Literature Essay

Why Read Literature? Essay

     Nothing teaches us better than literature to see, in ethnic and cultural differences, the richness of the human patrimony, and to prize those differences as manifestation humanity’s multi-faceted creativity. Reading good literature is an experience of pleasure, of course; but it is also an experience of learning what and how we are, on our human integrity and our human imperfection, with our actions, our dreams, and our ghosts, alone and in a relationship that link us to others, in our public image and in the secret recesses of our consciousness.
     The bond that literature establishes among human beings compels them to enter into dialogue. The bond also makes them conscious of a common origin and a common goal to exceed all temporal barriers. Literature transports us in to the past and links us to those who in the past eras plotted, enjoyed, and dreamed through texts such as The Bluest Eye by Toni Morrison and Invisible Man by Ralph Ellison that have come down to us, those text that now allow us also to enjoy and to dream. This feeling of membership in the collective human experience across tome and space is the highest achievement of culture, and nothing contributes more to its renewal in every generation than literature. It is important for this to happen so that we can learn from the past to improve our future.
     One of Literatures first beneficial effects takes place at the level of language. A community without a written literature expresses itself with less precision. According to Randy Fitzgerald, “with less richness and nuance, and with less clarity than a community whose principal instrument of communication, the word, has been cultivated and perfected by means of literary texts” (64). Without reading and untouched by literature will resemble a community of mutes and those of lost expressions afflicted tremendous problems of communication due to its crude and rude language. This is true for individuals, too. A person who does not read, or reads...

Loading: Checking Spelling

0%

Read more

Using literature in ESL and the principles of Communicative Language Teaching

1741 words - 7 pages Using literature in ESL and the principles of Communicative Language Teaching Among the reasons Van (2009) believes studying literature in the ESL classroom is advantageous (providing meaningful contexts, a profound range of vocabulary, enhancing creativity and developing cultural awareness and critical thinking), he mentions the fact that it is in line with CLT (Communicative Language Teaching) principles. It is worth to elaborate this last...

Fahrenheit 451: Religious Freedom due to the Extremity of Communism

1179 words - 5 pages In his novel, Fahrenheit 451, Ray Bradbury entices and allows readers to interpret the deeper meaning of the text, which lies far beyond the characters and the setting of the dystopia. Throughout the 50’s and 60’s, many people were deprived of religious freedom due to the extremity of communism. USSR, during the Cold War, required countries to be communists limiting them from their necessary freedoms. Within each of the multiple tragedies in...

Marcus Sowell’s Rhetorical Reading

1760 words - 7 pages A recent young adult novel has stirred up a lot of controversy in the world of writing literature. The issue is that current young adult literature is too dark for teen readers, or is merely more realistic than previous works for teens. In early June 2011, the Wall Street Journal ran an editorial written by book critic Meghan Cox Gurdon says how dark is contemporary fiction for teens? Darker than when you were a child, my...

Literacy Narrative

786 words - 3 pages My literacy skills began to develop at a young age, like most peoples. It first started through the typical bedtime stories read to me by my parents. Then it developed more when my mother would bring home practice workbooks for me to work on at home. Later on my literacy skills developed to a greater extent when I attended school and teachers began to shape and mold my style of reading and writing. The reason I wanted to developed and expand...

Importance of English Literature

910 words - 4 pages 1TrailWesley TrailENG 200 - Dr. Berry10 December 2012 - Final PaperThe Importance of English Literature English 200 is designed to introduce students to various forms and styles of English Literature. As the course progressed, our class read classics such as The Odyssey, Dante's Inferno, Heart of Darkness, and Song of Myself by

Ars Poetica by Archibald MacLeish

1534 words - 6 pages “Better a witty fool than a foolish wit.” Spoken like the artistic genius he was, Shakespeare provides an excellent example of how the world used to speak. Another example, which shall be noted as the inspiration of this paper, would be Ars Poetica by Archibald MacLeish. In this poem, he explains how he thinks a poem should be: “A poem should not mean But be.” This last line from the poem basically says that a poem should be more important than...

A Review of Responses to the National Endowment for the Arts Report, “Reading at Risk: A Survey of Literary Reading in America”

2290 words - 9 pages During the past twenty years there has been much debate over topics regarding literacy and literature in America. In June 2004, based on their comparison of literary reading surveys from 1982, 1992, and 2002, the National Endowment for the Arts released the following statement. The accelerating declines in literary reading among all demographic groups of American adults indicate an imminent cultural crisis. The trends among younger adults...

The History of Literature

2050 words - 8 pages Literature is defined as writing or books that are influential and well-remembered. To me it is more than writing, its learning and discovering and entertainment. Literature has been an important part of culture since the Greeks and is constantly changing. If you try hard enough, I guarantee you’ll find something you’ll love to read. Greek literature is probably considered the earliest form of knowledgeable and truly devoted literature. It...

Doublemajoring in Literature

1313 words - 5 pages Doublemajoring in Literature I came to Loras College intending to major in Biochemistry and only Biochemistry. I was prepared to be very serious in my studies, focused on facts, and determined to work as hard as possible to succeed, but I realized in my first semester Critical Writing: Poetry course the importance of feeling and expression in my life. I poured over chemistry and biology books, studying, rewriting, memorizing, and reveling...

Censorship in Schools

3737 words - 15 pages Censorship in Schools There has recently been a renewed interest and passion in the issue of censorship. In the realm of the censorship of books in schools alone, several hundred cases have surfaced each year for nearly the past decade. Controversies over which books to include in the high school English curriculum present a clash of values between teachers, school systems, and parents over what is appropriate for and meaningful to students....

Why Students are Not Reading and Ways to Get them to Read More

1258 words - 5 pages Why Students are Not Reading and Ways to Get them to Read More "We shouldn't teach great books. We should teach a love of reading." B. F. Skinner "What is a reader?" and "What makes a good reader?" Out of 100 eighth graders surveyed at a middle school in Pennsylvania, 73% of them said that you have to read a lot and practice reading. When the same one hundred eighth graders were asked how they feel about reading, 55% said they love it,...

In this week’s New Yorker , Adam Gopnik attempts to answer the question: “ Why Teach English? ” The fate of the English major is, as Gopnik notes, all the rage, but defenses of it are surprisingly unconvincing. He rightly points out that the two most common ones”that English majors make for better people and better societies”are patently false. Nor is studying literary texts, I might add, always the most effective means of improving reading or writing skills (though it certainly helps). “So why have English majors?” Gopnik asks:

Well, because many people like books. Most of those like to talk about them after they’ve read them, or while they’re in the middle. Some people like to talk about them so much that they want to spend their lives talking about them to other people who like to listen. Some of us do this all summer on the beach, and others all winter in a classroom. One might call this a natural or inevitable consequence of literacy. And it’s this living, irresistible, permanent interest in reading that supports English departments, and makes sense of English majors.

This is both right and wrong. Gopnik is absolutely right that reading and discussing literary works is natural.

Yet, the “instinct,” if we want to use that word, is of a higher order than mere cravings, which Gopnik glosses over when he compares the impetus to read to our need for clothing and shelter: “there really are no whys to such things, anymore than there are to why we wear clothes or paint good pictures or live in more than hovels and huts or send flowers to our beloved on their birthday.” Reading literature has nothing in common with living “in more than hovels and huts,” but sending flowers? Yes, it is like sending flowers, because it is an expression of those higher things that make us most human”our emotions, our recognition of the need for a moral order, our ability to experience beauty and so forth.

Furthermore, while there is no reason English must be studied at university, and while Gopnik is, again, right that its study at the university is supported by our “living, irresistible, permanent interest in reading,” he misses an opportunity to address how English professors have at times failed to feed that interest over the years.

Gopnik compares Samuel Johnson to modern English professors: “Indeed, before there were English professors, there were . . . English professors. Dr. Johnson was the greatest English professor who ever lived”the great cham of literature, to whom all turned.” His point in this admittedly rather brief aside is that people have always studied literature. But there is an important difference between Johnson and other men of letters and modern English professors. It is this: that the writing of these earlier men of letters differs from the writing of most (certainly not all) English professors today. Earlier critics wrote mostly essays and reviews to help sift the wheat from the chaff. When they did write books, which was comparatively rare, they wrote mostly what we would call trade books”biographies, collections of essays, etc.”which, even if somewhat technical at times, were still accessible to a general readership. In short, the writing developed out of and nourished an interest in reading great poems, plays, and novels.

Today, instead of Joseph Addison’s essays or Dr. Johnson’s lives of poets, we have hundreds of books like Equivocal Beings: Politics, Gender, and Sentimentality in the 1790s ” Wollstonecraft, Radcliffe, Burney, Austen (Chicago, 2012) or Feminist Ecocriticism: Environment, Women, and Literature (Lexington, 2012). I have not read either book, so I can’t say anything about the quality of argument in each, though I can say rather confidently that neither was written for the general public, nor are either likely to increase interest in these authors and texts.

One of the problems with English studies today, brought about in part by English professors themselves and in part by the modern research university, is the separation between “specialists” and the public. The sciences have a specialized vocabulary and knowledge that have developed organically, as it were, from its methods, and, because of this, scientists regularly must “translate” their discoveries for the public so that the their value can be understood. But the constraints of “discovery” and “original research,” which are part of the scientific disciplines but not the humanities, were applied (or adopted) by English studies, pushing English professors to abandon reviews and criticism and pursue increasingly esoteric “research agendas.” And because the jargon of English studies is often unnatural, any effort to “translate” it sounds absurd.

All this to say, Dr. Johnson was not an English professor in any modern sense, and one of the things English professors must do (and encourage the university system to acknowledge) is to pursue the type of work that is organic to the discipline”evaluative criticism (this is good work, this is not), introductions, translations, manuscript retrieval and preparation, and so forth. Some of these are recognized in the discipline (such as work with archival materials, especially the digitization of them), but others are not or are seen as inferior. (The misguided attempt to take down Stanley Fish in The New Republic for, among other things, not pursuing more esoteric research is an example of this. He too often “swims at the surface,” Jacoby wrote last week.)

Gopnik himself admits that there is a difference between what English professors and scientists do. “The study of English, to be sure,” he writes, “suffers from its own discontents: it isn’t a science, and so the ‘research’ you do is, as my colleague Louis Menand has pointed out, archival futzing aside, not really research.” Yet, his hedged “re-reading” of Dr. Johnson as a professor prevents him from fleshing out what this difference means.

English does not need to be studied at the university. (The cost of university education is obviously an important factor, though I would argue that is a different question.) But if it is in fifty or a hundred years, it will not be because of reports to Congress defending the humanities but because English and humanities professors move away from the research paradigm of the sciences and return to the sort of work natural to the discipline.

Micah Mattix is an assistant professor of literature at Houston Baptist University and the editor of Prufrock , a daily newsletter of books, art and ideas.

Become a fan of First Things on Facebook , subscribe to First Things via RSS , and follow First Things on Twitter .

Prev Article

Next Article

One thought on “Why We Read Literature Essay

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *